當(dāng)前位置：法律圖書(shū)館>>法治動(dòng)態(tài)>>期刊目錄>>《河北法學(xué)》2012年第六期目錄與摘要

《河北法學(xué)》2012年第六期目錄與摘要

http://www.longbang024.com　 2012-7-26 14:34:14　 來(lái)源：中國(guó)法學(xué)會(huì)網(wǎng)

1、我國(guó)金融機(jī)構(gòu)理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)的法律困境與探索
郭江山（中央財(cái)經(jīng)大學(xué)金融學(xué)院）;李大慶（北京大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
【摘要】 在我國(guó)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展、國(guó)民收入不斷提高、理財(cái)需求增加的背景下,理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)開(kāi)始如火如荼地進(jìn)行,但同時(shí)在金融機(jī)構(gòu)和客戶(hù)之間引發(fā)了各種各樣的法律糾紛。尤其是對(duì)理財(cái)活動(dòng)屬性和法律關(guān)系,在學(xué)界和實(shí)務(wù)界引起了廣泛爭(zhēng)論。另外,理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)中雙方當(dāng)事人權(quán)利和義務(wù)不清,理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)跨業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)的法律空白和交集,保底承諾能否突破,監(jiān)管機(jī)制缺失也是急需解決的問(wèn)題。在我國(guó)金融機(jī)構(gòu)理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)法規(guī)的探索中,需要注意在混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)趨勢(shì)下,采取統(tǒng)一立法形式,明確理財(cái)業(yè)務(wù)法律屬性,建立防范利益輸送機(jī)制的相關(guān)制度。 
【Abstract】 Financing business develops rapidly with increasement of national income and financing demand,while all kinds of legal dispute were involved . One of them is about legal attribute of financing business , which gave rise to intense repercussions and widespread debates in an academia and practical circle. The second problem is that vagueness in law can lead to indeterminacies in legal rights and obligations. There are many problems such as mixed operation unavoidably,keeping the promises and the lack of regulation. Using information ,this paper makes the detailed analysis. The conclusion shows that on the other hand there should be a clear and definite law attribut on financing business ,on the other hand a series of system should also be setup.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 金融機(jī)構(gòu)； 理財(cái)屬性； 理財(cái)立法； 理財(cái)監(jiān)管；
【Key words】 financial institution； attribute of financing business； legislation of financing business； regulation of financing business；
 
2、在法治方略下尋求社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新
肖北庚 （湖南師范大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新是我國(guó)社會(huì)建設(shè)事業(yè)推進(jìn)過(guò)程中回應(yīng)現(xiàn)階段經(jīng)濟(jì)政治社會(huì)發(fā)展的必然要求。在法治方面成為國(guó)家根本治國(guó)方略的當(dāng)代,在法治方略下尋求社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新具有現(xiàn)實(shí)正當(dāng)性和優(yōu)越性;依法適度培植社會(huì)組織和規(guī)范引導(dǎo)社會(huì)組織發(fā)展、在立法模式上改過(guò)去的行政主導(dǎo)立法為博弈立法、完善稅收法制、立法中更多地吸收社會(huì)生活中形成的習(xí)慣和慣例、構(gòu)建政府與社會(huì)分工合作各司其職的適法格局等是法治方略下尋求社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新的根本性舉措。社會(huì)管理法治化是人類(lèi)社會(huì)發(fā)展和法治發(fā)展之邏輯必然。 
【Abstract】 During the proceeding of Chinese social construction, the innovation of social management is an indispensable requirement in response to the current economic,political and social development. The rule by law has already become the fundamental statecraft of nowadays’ China,therefore the pursuit of social management innovation is endowed with real legitimacy and incomparable superiority. In order to realize the social management innovation,we are supposed to take certain fundamental initiatives,such as to cultivate and develop social organizations under law moderately,to change from the past executiveled legislation mode to the game legislation mode,to perfect the tax legal system,to admit more habits and conventions formed in the social life by legislation,and to build the framework of labor division between the government and the society. Consequently,social management by law is the inevitable logical result of development of human society and the rule by law.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 社會(huì)管理創(chuàng)新； 社會(huì)建設(shè)； 法治； 正當(dāng)性； 社會(huì)組織；
【Key words】 innovation of social management； social construction； the rule by law； legitimacy； society organizations；
 
3、醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品損害責(zé)任三論
楊立新 （中國(guó)人民大學(xué)民商事法律科學(xué)研究中心）
 
【摘要】 醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品損害責(zé)任是《侵權(quán)責(zé)任法》第59條規(guī)定的醫(yī)療損害責(zé)任類(lèi)型,關(guān)于責(zé)任分擔(dān)的規(guī)則規(guī)定得不夠完善,應(yīng)當(dāng)根據(jù)產(chǎn)品責(zé)任的一般規(guī)則以及侵權(quán)責(zé)任法的連帶責(zé)任規(guī)則進(jìn)行補(bǔ)充。血液屬于準(zhǔn)產(chǎn)品,應(yīng)當(dāng)適用醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品損害責(zé)任規(guī)則確定醫(yī)療機(jī)構(gòu)的賠償責(zé)任。消毒藥劑構(gòu)成醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品損害責(zé)任,其缺陷的判定有一定特點(diǎn)。 
【Abstract】 Liability for damages caused by medical products is one of the liability for medical damages ruled by Article 59 of Law of Tort Liability. However,the rules about the burden of liability are not perfect, which should be supplemented according to the general rules of product liability and the joint liability of Law of Tort Liability. Blood is quasi product. Medical institution should burden the liability caused by blood according to the rule of liability for damages caused by medical products. The disinfectant can cause the liability for medical damages. But its defect definition has its own characteristics.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 醫(yī)療產(chǎn)品損害責(zé)任； 不真正連帶責(zé)任； 連帶責(zé)任； 血液； 消毒藥劑；
【Key words】 liability for damages caused by medical products； nontypical joint liability； joint liability； blood； disin- fectant；
 
4、基本農(nóng)田保護(hù)的法制探討
宋才發(fā) （中央民族大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 國(guó)家著力實(shí)施基本農(nóng)田保護(hù)制度,保住基本農(nóng)田就保住了我國(guó)耕地的精華,必須對(duì)基本農(nóng)田依法實(shí)施嚴(yán)格的監(jiān)督管理,確定基本農(nóng)田質(zhì)量依據(jù)和考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。必須著力構(gòu)建和劃定永久性基本農(nóng)田,狠抓基本農(nóng)田水利設(shè)施建設(shè),深化基本農(nóng)田土壤改良,推進(jìn)基本農(nóng)田機(jī)械化耕作,加強(qiáng)基本農(nóng)田生態(tài)環(huán)境建設(shè),強(qiáng)化基本農(nóng)田科技研發(fā)和應(yīng)用,落實(shí)基本農(nóng)田農(nóng)產(chǎn)品質(zhì)量安全標(biāo)準(zhǔn)。 
【Abstract】 G overnm ent m akes every effort to im plem ent the basic farm land protection system ,which keeps the essence of the basic farm land. It is necessary to im plem ent strict supervision according to law,to determ ine the quality and appraisal standards of basic farm land. W e m ust construct and delim it perm anentbasic farm land,constructthe water conservancy facilities ofbasic farm land,deepen the soil im provem entof basic farm land,and prom ote the m echanized farm ing of basic farm land,strengthen ecological environm ent construction of basic farm land,strengthen the technology developm ent and application basic farm land ofbasic farm land,carry outthe produce quality safety standard ofbasic farm - land.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 基本農(nóng)田； 質(zhì)量依據(jù)； 考核標(biāo)準(zhǔn)； 保護(hù)制度；
【Key words】 the basic farm land； quality basis； appraisalstandards； protection system；
 
5、事實(shí)大還是法官大?——論證據(jù)排除規(guī)則
裴蒼齡 （西北政法大學(xué)）
 
【摘要】 證據(jù)是認(rèn)識(shí)的基礎(chǔ)、證明的根據(jù)、檢驗(yàn)的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、思想的指南。什么能當(dāng)此重任?惟有事實(shí)。證據(jù)是事實(shí),事實(shí)不存在非法、合法的問(wèn)題。事實(shí)是客觀的,既不受法律調(diào)整,也不受法律制約,因而證據(jù)也沒(méi)有合法性。證據(jù)不能排除。排除證據(jù)的實(shí)質(zhì)是法官睜著眼睛不認(rèn)事實(shí),排除證據(jù)的法官把自己和事實(shí)的位置擺錯(cuò)了,這是一項(xiàng)根本性的錯(cuò)誤。非法獲取人證是司法警察通過(guò)刑訊逼供和指名問(wèn)供這樣兩重罪行實(shí)現(xiàn)的,因而它不是程序,而是程序中的實(shí)體。 
【Abstract】 Evidance is the basis for cognition and testification,the standard of inspection,and the guide of thinking. Whatcan becom e a burden?O nly the facts. Prooves are facts,while there are no legal or illegalquestions for facts as facts are objective,neither subject to legal regulation nor subject to legal constraints. Therefore,there are no legal questions for prooves. Nor can prooves be ruled out. If a judge would exclude any evidance,it merely means the judge had shut his eyes up before the facts. Such a judge had misplaced prooves and him self,which is a big mistake. Illegally obtaining witness is realized eigherthrough torturing the suspectto extractconfessions orthrough asking fora crime by name for such crimes by the police. O bviously,both conducts are illegitimate. So illegally obtaining witness is the substance ofa procedure rahter than the procedure itself.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 證據(jù)； 排除； 刑訊逼供； 指名問(wèn)供；
【Key words】 evidance； exclude； torturing the suspectto extractconfessions； asking for a crime by name；
 
6、避免雙重征稅協(xié)定適用中應(yīng)注意的幾個(gè)問(wèn)題
趙學(xué)清;歐蓉蓉 （西南政法大學(xué)）
 
【摘要】 隨著我國(guó)對(duì)外經(jīng)濟(jì)聯(lián)系進(jìn)一步加強(qiáng),收入與納稅人的國(guó)際化趨勢(shì)凸顯,如何避免和減少雙重征稅具有舉足輕重的作用,同時(shí),稅收協(xié)定在消除國(guó)家間雙重征稅壁壘中,發(fā)揮著越來(lái)越大的作用。對(duì)避免雙重征稅協(xié)定適用的特殊性進(jìn)行分析,提出根據(jù)相關(guān)沖突法原理和規(guī)則處理雙重征稅所涉及的若干問(wèn)題的路徑和方法。 
【Abstract】 With the further strengthening of China’s foreign economics,the international trend of incom e and the taxpayer’s highlights,and how to avoid and reduce double taxation plays a pivotal role. This article analyzes the specialnature of the application of avoidance of double taxation agreem ents and gives the relevantprinciples and the processing path for a number of issues involved in the double taxation in accordance with the rules ofconflictoflaws.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 稅收管轄權(quán)； 避免雙重征稅； 沖突； 法律適用；
【Key words】 tax jurisdiction； avoid double taxation； conflict； law application；
 
7、美國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)庭審階段職權(quán)淺析
張鴻巍 （廣西大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 美國(guó)檢察官在庭審階段享有較為廣泛的職權(quán),涵蓋出庭支持公訴權(quán)、挑選陪審員權(quán)、法庭辯論權(quán)及對(duì)陪審團(tuán)指示的檢察建議權(quán)等等。其中,檢察官在庭審階段的法庭辯論權(quán),大體上又可分為開(kāi)庭陳述權(quán)、展示證據(jù)權(quán)、交叉詢(xún)問(wèn)權(quán)與結(jié)案陳詞權(quán)等等。此外,檢察官在法官向陪審團(tuán)作出指示前,亦可提出相應(yīng)檢察建議。 
【Abstract】 At the trialphases,the American prosecutors usually exercise wide range of authorities,including the rights to supportprosecution in court,selectjurors,debate and provide advice to jury instructions and so forth. Among them ,as forthe rights to debate,itincludes the rights to startwith opening statem ent, reveal rebuttal evidence,conduct cross-exam ination and conclude with closing argum ent,etc. In addition,prosecutors could also provide his advices to judge before jury instructions.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 美國(guó)檢察機(jī)關(guān)； 出庭支持公訴權(quán)； 挑選陪審員權(quán)； 法庭辯論權(quán)； 對(duì)陪審團(tuán)指示的檢察建議權(quán)；
【Key words】 Am erican prosecutor’s office； right to support prosecution in court； right to select jurors； right to debate； rightto provide the advice to jury instructions；
 
8、論國(guó)家義務(wù)概念之確立與發(fā)展
蔣銀華 （廣州大學(xué)檢察理論研究中心）
 
【摘要】 對(duì)國(guó)家、人權(quán)思想變遷的基本史實(shí)與思想史進(jìn)行簡(jiǎn)要梳理,論述國(guó)家義務(wù)是國(guó)家起源的孿生物,國(guó)家義務(wù)是實(shí)現(xiàn)國(guó)家目的的有效途徑,凡人權(quán)所在之處,即為國(guó)家義務(wù)并行之時(shí),相關(guān)制度設(shè)計(jì)為國(guó)家義務(wù)的確立提供了可行性方案,發(fā)現(xiàn)國(guó)家義務(wù)形成于《大憲章》時(shí)期,確立于17世紀(jì)英國(guó)資產(chǎn)階級(jí)革命時(shí)期以及闡述其在近當(dāng)代的發(fā)展變遷,并進(jìn)一步總結(jié)出國(guó)家負(fù)有人權(quán)保障義務(wù)屬應(yīng)有之義。 
【Abstract】 This paper,while presenting a brief review on the evolution of the theory of nation and hum an rights, referring to the basic historical facts and intellectual history,argues that nations’obligations grow synchronically with the origin of it,that nations’obligation is an effective m eans of achieving nations’ goals,that hum an rights go side by side with nations’obligations and that the designing of relevant system s provides a feasible fram ework for the establishm ent of nations’obligations. This paper also reveals the developm entofthe conceptofnations’obligations from its presence in The GreatChart,to its establishm entin British capitalism revolution era and the latest developm ents in contem porary society. The author further concludes that inherently,a nation bears the responsibility of safeguarding hum an rights.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 國(guó)家目的； 人權(quán)保障； 國(guó)家義務(wù)；
【Key words】 nation’s goals； safeguarding ofhum an rights； nation’s obligations；
 
9、社會(huì)保障主體義務(wù)分擔(dān)機(jī)制研究——以政府履行社會(huì)保障義務(wù)為視角
楊淑霞 （廣州大學(xué)檢察理論研究中心）
 
【摘要】 2011年7月1日生效的《中華人民共和國(guó)社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)法》,以法律形式確立了我國(guó)"政府主導(dǎo)型"的社會(huì)保障模式。歷史和現(xiàn)實(shí)昭示:各級(jí)政府履行社會(huì)保障義務(wù)的優(yōu)劣,直接影響公民各項(xiàng)社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)權(quán)利的實(shí)現(xiàn),關(guān)系社會(huì)的和諧穩(wěn)定。貫徹實(shí)施《社會(huì)保險(xiǎn)法》,應(yīng)針對(duì)政府履行社保義務(wù)存在的問(wèn)題,根據(jù)不同社保項(xiàng)目的特點(diǎn),確定中央和地方政府分擔(dān)社會(huì)保障義務(wù)的機(jī)制。 
【Abstract】 The Social Insurance Law ofthe People’s Republic of China,which came into effectin 1stJuly,2011, establishes a "leading by the governm ent"style society security. The history and the present tell that, the grade of how the society security obligation is perform ed by alllevels ofgovernm ents directly infects on the fulfillment of allkinds of citizens’social insurance rights and concerns the harm ony and stability of the society. The implem entation ofSocialInsurance Law of the People’s Republic of China,should be directed against the existing problem s of governm ents’perform ance in fulfilling the society security obligations,and should be according to the characters ofdifferentitem s of society security,establish a obligation sharing mechanism between centralgovernm entand localgovernm ents as well.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 社會(huì)保障權(quán)； 履行缺失； 義務(wù)分擔(dān)機(jī)制； 監(jiān)管責(zé)任；
【Key words】 the right of society security； perform ance defect； obligation sharing mechanism； duty of scrutiny；
 
10、馳名商標(biāo)保護(hù)的異化與理性回歸
溫芽清（河北經(jīng)貿(mào)大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)管理學(xué)院）;南振興 （石家莊經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 馳名商標(biāo)保護(hù)的價(jià)值目標(biāo),隨其保護(hù)范圍和保護(hù)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的演進(jìn),歷經(jīng)了消費(fèi)者中心主義和商標(biāo)權(quán)人中心主義,但至善至美的價(jià)值目標(biāo)應(yīng)是商標(biāo)私權(quán)與社會(huì)公共利益的精妙均衡與和諧。我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)保護(hù)過(guò)度關(guān)懷商標(biāo)權(quán)而忽視社會(huì)公共利益,從而導(dǎo)致了世所罕見(jiàn)的認(rèn)定異化—立法異化—司法異化的進(jìn)路,認(rèn)定方式異化為主動(dòng)、批量、集中認(rèn)定,認(rèn)定效力異化為全域長(zhǎng)期有效,認(rèn)定標(biāo)準(zhǔn)異化為好聲譽(yù)、高質(zhì)量、大銷(xiāo)量,保護(hù)范圍異化為全類(lèi)一統(tǒng)保護(hù)。要徹底實(shí)現(xiàn)我國(guó)馳名商標(biāo)保護(hù)的理性回歸,必須深植其價(jià)值目標(biāo)之"根",培育其價(jià)值理念之"土";重塑其事后終極救濟(jì)性、被動(dòng)、個(gè)案認(rèn)定的即時(shí)有效性的運(yùn)行機(jī)制;建立馳名商標(biāo)反淡化制度;優(yōu)化制度環(huán)境,規(guī)制認(rèn)定自由裁量;規(guī)范企業(yè)對(duì)馳名商標(biāo)的使用。 
【Abstract】 With the evolution of scope and standard of famous tradem ark’s protection,the value target of famous tradem ark has experienced the change from consumer-centered to rightholder-centered. Butthe perfect value targetoftradem ark should be the exquisite and delicate balance and harm ony between private right and social public interest. The protection of fam ous tradem ark in China has been given excessive concern to tradem ark rightrather than socialpublic interestwhich had led to a scarce way ofevolution: recognizing alienation-legislative alienation-judicial alienation. The alienation of recognizing method appears to be initiative,batch and centralized;the effectiveness of recognizing has become countryround and long term ;the standard ofrecognizing has aliened to be good credit,high quality and large sum ofselling and the scope of protection has extended to the whole category of the com modities. To realize the rational regression of the protection of famous tradem ark in China,we should plant the "root"of its value target and foster the "soil"of its value idea;reconstruct the mechanism of its afterward remedy,passive and individualrecognition as wellas timely and effective running mechanism . Meanwhile,we should also establish the anti-dilution system of famous trademark,optimize the environment of system ,regulate and recognize discretionary of trademark and standardize the use of famous trademark.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 馳名商標(biāo)； 制度異化； 價(jià)值目標(biāo)；
【Key words】 famous trademark； alienation ofsystem； value target；
 
11、占有在現(xiàn)代財(cái)產(chǎn)制度中的地位申明———一種基于動(dòng)態(tài)沖突的考察
季境 （西南政法大學(xué)應(yīng)用法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 占有因其獨(dú)占性、排他性以及在動(dòng)產(chǎn)上所獨(dú)具的權(quán)利外觀效力,導(dǎo)致其負(fù)載權(quán)利與第三人利益的沖突,成為物權(quán)法調(diào)整客觀公正與交易安全的關(guān)鍵制度。在對(duì)占有性質(zhì)重新定位的前提下,通過(guò)對(duì)財(cái)產(chǎn)制度中占有關(guān)系的檢索,可在交易各方主體的利益沖突關(guān)系中對(duì)占有概念進(jìn)行理性的闡釋。通過(guò)對(duì)此類(lèi)占有關(guān)系的剖析,并通過(guò)對(duì)占有的性質(zhì)———法益的進(jìn)一步抽象,可以厘清占有中法益在財(cái)產(chǎn)制度中的具體法律價(jià)值。其體現(xiàn)為本權(quán)的沖突上屬排他性沖突,保護(hù)方法上為非此即彼:或保護(hù)權(quán)利或保護(hù)第三人利益。 
【Abstract】 Possession has traits of monopolistic,exclusive and representing the right of personal property. These features led to the confliction with third party rights. Possession becom es a key legal system relating justice and transaction security in property law. From a new perspective,we can have a rational explanation aboutthe conflictions between differentparties. With this perspective,we can have deeper understanding of the legal value of possession. At the end,we can choose to protect the rights represented by possession or to protectthird party rights.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 占有； 利益衡平； 法益； 交易安全；
【Key words】 possession； equitable share of benefits； legalinterests； transaction security；
 
12、民商法在中國(guó)古代法中的地位和發(fā)展歷程
王瑞 （北方工業(yè)大學(xué)文法學(xué)院法律系）
 
【摘要】 中國(guó)古代存在規(guī)范意義上的民商法,中國(guó)古代民商法是在以刑為主、諸法合體的封建保守法律體系中得以存在和發(fā)展的,其在中國(guó)古代法律體系中一直處于從屬與次要的地位,民商法典始終沒(méi)有從刑法典中獨(dú)立出來(lái),并且,民法與商法規(guī)范也是不加區(qū)分地混在一起。中國(guó)古代民商法律規(guī)范經(jīng)歷了一個(gè)從少到多,從簡(jiǎn)單到復(fù)雜,從民刑不分到民刑有分,從相對(duì)分散到相對(duì)集中的發(fā)展歷程。 
【Abstract】 In ancientChina,there were civiland commerciallaw provisions although there were no civilcode and commercialcode. The civiland com m erciallaw provisions were hidden in the crim inal code,and they were in a subordinate position. The civil code and commercial code were never independent from the crim inalcode in ancientChina. Butthe civiland commercial law provisions passed a way from less to more,from simple to complex.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 民商法； 中國(guó)古代法； 演進(jìn)；
【Key words】 civiland commerciallaw； the law ofancientChina； evolution；
 
13、論犯罪故意程度的劃分及其法律價(jià)值
朱俊強(qiáng) （廣州大學(xué)檢察理論研究中心）
 
【摘要】 犯罪故意不僅有類(lèi)型之分,而且有程度之分;我國(guó)刑法學(xué)界對(duì)此缺乏探討,不利于此領(lǐng)域研究的深入發(fā)展。國(guó)外同仁的探討,雖然給了我們一些啟示,但仍有失偏頗。依據(jù)故意心理態(tài)度形成過(guò)程中的自覺(jué)性/獨(dú)立性狀況,犯罪故意程度可劃分為主動(dòng)故意、被動(dòng)故意和被迫故意三個(gè)程度遞減的層次,這種劃分具有重要的司法價(jià)值和立法價(jià)值,體現(xiàn)了罪責(zé)刑相統(tǒng)一的法治精神,有利于制約法官的自由裁量權(quán),有利于對(duì)我國(guó)刑法相關(guān)規(guī)定的理論探討。 
【Abstract】 Criminal intention may be classified into different types according to the degree of the intention. Inadequate research ofthis problem in the crim inalacademy of China is unfavorable forthe further study in this field. Researches and studies ofthe foreign experts,which may offerus some enlightenm ent,are stillbiased. According to the consciousness or independence constituted in the process of intentionally psychological attitude,crim inal intention degree may be degressively divided into active intention, passive intention and forced intention. Division in this way indicates im portant judicial value and legislative value,and em bodies the legal consistency of crimes and crim inal liabilities. It helps to restrictthe judges’discretion and facilitate the theoretical discussion of the relevant provisions of the Chinese crim inallaw.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 犯罪故意； 類(lèi)型； 程度； 自覺(jué)性； 獨(dú)立性；
【Key words】 crim inalintention； types； degree； consciousness； independence；
 
14、我國(guó)自洗錢(qián)行為不獨(dú)立成罪的原因分析
姚兵 （北京市社科院首都綜治研究所）
 
【摘要】 從理論上講,傳統(tǒng)的行為理論和牽連犯理論不支持單獨(dú)追訴自洗錢(qián)行為;從立法上說(shuō),刑法定性+定量的犯罪設(shè)立標(biāo)準(zhǔn)、上游犯罪的重刑配置和國(guó)際上對(duì)單獨(dú)追究自洗錢(qián)行為的非強(qiáng)制性要求使中國(guó)刑法無(wú)須單獨(dú)追究自洗錢(qián)行為;就司法而言,實(shí)踐中能夠通過(guò)將自洗錢(qián)評(píng)價(jià)為提高法定刑檔次或從重處罰的"情節(jié)"來(lái)實(shí)現(xiàn)罪刑均衡使自洗錢(qián)行為獨(dú)立成罪缺乏實(shí)踐動(dòng)力。 
【Abstract】 In theory,the traditionalbehavior theory and implicated theory don’tsupporta separate prosecution for money laundering;In legislation,the reasons why self-money laundering dose not constitute a crime independently include the standard of qualitative and quantitative,the heavy penalty of predicate offenses and the non-m andatory requirem ents of international provision;In adm inistration of justice, there is little power m ake self-money laundering to constitute a crime independently because it can be evaluated the plotwhich im prove the grade of legal punishm ent or be punished severely to achieve the balance of crime and punishm entin practice.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 洗錢(qián)犯罪； 自洗錢(qián)； 不獨(dú)立成罪；
【Key words】 money laundering crim e； self-money laundering； notconstitute a crime independently；
 
15、危險(xiǎn)個(gè)人概念的產(chǎn)生溯源
呂新建（蘇州大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 危險(xiǎn)個(gè)人概念產(chǎn)生于19世紀(jì)中后期。當(dāng)時(shí),工業(yè)經(jīng)濟(jì)快速發(fā)展,人口迅猛增加,但社會(huì)環(huán)境惡化,危險(xiǎn)個(gè)人大量涌現(xiàn),嚴(yán)重威脅著社會(huì)安全。這一概念的產(chǎn)生還受到了實(shí)證主義、達(dá)爾文進(jìn)化論以及精神病學(xué)的發(fā)展的影響,而且與國(guó)家懲罰權(quán)力的轉(zhuǎn)型密切相關(guān)。 
【Abstract】 The concept of dangerous individuals stems from the late 19th century. Atthattime,industrialeconomy developed fastly and population increased rapidly,but due to social environm ental deteriorated, dangerous individuals emerged in a large am ount,it was a serious threat to social security. The generation ofthe conceptinfluenced by the developm entof the positivism ,Darwin’s theory of evolution and the psychiatry,and also the transform ation ofthe state punishm entpower closely related.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 危險(xiǎn)個(gè)人； 規(guī)訓(xùn)權(quán)力； 實(shí)證主義； 進(jìn)化論； 精神病學(xué)；
【Key words】 dangerous individual； discipline power； positivism； theory ofevolution； psychiatry；
 
16、論《私營(yíng)企業(yè)暫行條例》的存與廢
楊積堂 （北京聯(lián)合大學(xué)應(yīng)用文理學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 《私營(yíng)企業(yè)暫行條例》自1988年頒布實(shí)施以來(lái)已經(jīng)23年有余,其立法的背景和實(shí)施的環(huán)境早已發(fā)生了根本性的改變,更重要的是該條例的相應(yīng)規(guī)定很多都已過(guò)時(shí),且與其后出臺(tái)的很多法律相矛盾、相沖突,尤其是《公司法》、《合伙企業(yè)法》和《個(gè)人獨(dú)資企業(yè)法》相繼單獨(dú)立法并頒布施行后,《私營(yíng)企業(yè)暫行條例》失去了存在的根基。因此,及時(shí)廢止《私營(yíng)企業(yè)暫行條例》是必然的選擇。尤其是不能任"暫行"條例無(wú)限期地暫行下去,以確保立法的科學(xué)性和嚴(yán)肅性。 
【Abstract】 Twenty-three years has passed since Provisional Regulations of People’s Republic of China on Private Enterprises was prom ulgated and implemented. Its legislative background and im plem ented environm ent have undergone the essentialchanges. M ore im portantly,m any corresponding regulations have been out of date as well as in contradiction to the laws later prom ulgated. Especially,with the Company Law, Partnership Business Law and Law of Individual Sole Investor Enterprise separately and successively prom ulgated,Provisional Regulations of People’s Republic of China on Private Enterprises lost its existence foundation. Therefore,prom ptly repealing Provisional Regulations of People’s Republic of China on Private Enterprises is an inevitable choice. Particularly,provisional regulations should not be exited for an infinite period,thus the scientific nature and seriousness oflegislation can be guaranteed.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 私營(yíng)企業(yè)； 暫行條例； 廢止；
【Key words】 private enterprises； provisionalregulations； repeal；
 
17、環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度構(gòu)建理論研究
崔金星 （西南科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院/西南政法大學(xué)經(jīng)濟(jì)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 權(quán)利基礎(chǔ)研究是部門(mén)法理論發(fā)展的源泉,以環(huán)境權(quán)理論引領(lǐng)并承載環(huán)境法制度的縱深發(fā)展困難重重。環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)公法性私權(quán)的研究視角,直面資源時(shí)代生態(tài)保護(hù)的現(xiàn)實(shí)立法需求和個(gè)體性私權(quán)保護(hù)的憲政價(jià)值,拓展環(huán)境法制度架構(gòu)空間,開(kāi)展環(huán)境法與傳統(tǒng)部門(mén)法的對(duì)話。環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)尊重并吸納國(guó)家環(huán)境政策與制度創(chuàng)新的實(shí)踐成果,以環(huán)境利用和保護(hù)中的財(cái)產(chǎn)利益為中心,探求排污權(quán)、環(huán)境容量使用權(quán)、環(huán)境利用權(quán)、生態(tài)效益受益權(quán)等管制型環(huán)境私權(quán)法理基礎(chǔ)和生長(zhǎng)空間。并圍繞環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)制度目標(biāo)的實(shí)現(xiàn),探求環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)保護(hù)的制度平臺(tái)和國(guó)家環(huán)境制度創(chuàng)新的發(fā)展方向。 
【Abstract】 Research ofbasic rights is the source of the development for the department law. Environm ental right theory has much difficulty in leading the further development of environmental law. From the perspective of public law,research of environm ental property rights could deal well with the value conflicts of the constitutionalprotection for private rights and requirem ent of ecological protection,and expand the space of institutional fram ework of environm ental law,carry out a dialogue between the traditionalbranches of law and environm ental law. The purpose of environm ental property rights is to inductthe practical institutional innovation of environm ental protection,find the common principle of the emission rights,the rights for using environm ental capacity,beneficial rights for environm ental benefits,etc,explore the nationalin stitutional innovation platform for the environm entalprotection.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 環(huán)境財(cái)產(chǎn)權(quán)； 環(huán)境權(quán)； 公法性私權(quán)； 制度創(chuàng)新；
【Key words】 environm entalproperty rights； environm entalrights； private right of public law； institutional innovation；
 
18、擎制與突圍:法院受理環(huán)境公益訴訟案件動(dòng)力機(jī)制的缺陷與重塑
劉超 （華僑大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 理論界和實(shí)務(wù)界對(duì)環(huán)境公益訴訟的研究普遍忽視了法院/法官對(duì)于環(huán)境公益訴訟案件的認(rèn)知與態(tài)度,當(dāng)前法院與法官普遍對(duì)于環(huán)境公益訴訟持有保守與拒絕的態(tài)度,其原因在于法院受理環(huán)境公益訴訟案件的動(dòng)力機(jī)制存在缺陷:法律依據(jù)不足、專(zhuān)門(mén)環(huán)境訴訟機(jī)制缺位,法院排斥群體性訴訟,環(huán)保法庭的制度突破難以獲得法官群體的廣泛認(rèn)同。因此,必須從完善環(huán)境公益訴訟的法律依據(jù)、構(gòu)建系統(tǒng)的環(huán)境訴訟機(jī)制體系、進(jìn)行專(zhuān)業(yè)培訓(xùn)和環(huán)境問(wèn)題的社會(huì)建構(gòu)等幾個(gè)方面開(kāi)發(fā)與重塑法院受理環(huán)境公益訴訟案件的動(dòng)力機(jī)制。 
【Abstract】 The study oftheorists and practitioners on environm entalpublic interestlitigation is com prehensive,but they generally ignore the knowledge and attitudes of court/judge on environm ental public interest litigation. The current court and judges generally adopt a conservative attitude and refuse to environm entalpublic interestlitigation. The reason is that,when courtacceptthe environm entalpublic interestlitigation case,the dynam ic mechanism is defective. These defects include:lack oflegalbasis; the absence of specialm echanisms forenvironm entallitigation,courtrejection of mass action,judges do notagree with the system break of environm ental court. Therefore,we must com plete the dynamic mechanism of the court from the following aspects:improve the legal basis for environm ental public interest litigation,build the mechanism system of environm entallitigation,professional training,social construction ofenvironm entalproblems.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 環(huán)境公益訴訟； 法院； 動(dòng)力機(jī)制； 缺陷； 重塑；
【Key words】 environm entalpublic interestlitigation； court； dynamic mechanism； defect； remodeling；
 
19、論既判力理論在民事訴訟司法實(shí)踐中的適用
鄧輝輝 （桂林電子科技大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 既判力理論在我國(guó)民事訴訟中處在理論上的重視與立法上的輕視、實(shí)踐中的漠視之尷尬境地。傳統(tǒng)法律文化的缺乏、法律繼受歷史的排斥、市場(chǎng)經(jīng)濟(jì)不發(fā)達(dá)和職權(quán)主義訴訟模式的制約、司法權(quán)威性的缺失、法官法律素質(zhì)和職業(yè)道德的影響是既判力理論在民事訴訟司法實(shí)踐中適用存在困境的原因。為了擺脫既判力理論在民事訴訟司法實(shí)踐中適用存在的困境,應(yīng)當(dāng)在思想層面上樹(shù)立既判力的觀念,進(jìn)一步深化既判力理念的研究,在立法上全面、正確地體現(xiàn)既判力理論,加強(qiáng)對(duì)當(dāng)事人的程序保障,深化司法體制改革以增強(qiáng)司法權(quán)威性,大力提高法官的法律素質(zhì)和職業(yè)道德水準(zhǔn)。 
【Abstract】 The theory ofres judicata in ourcivilaction is in an embarrassing stituation thatitis paid attention to in theory while itis neglected in legislation and ignored in practice. The reasons are as following:the lack oftraditionallegalculture,the exclusion of the law history,the constraints of the undeveloped market economy and ex officio litigation system ,the lack ofjudicialauthority,the effectofjudges’legal ethics and professionalethics. In orderto getrid ofthe em barrassing situation ofresjudicata theory,we should setthe concept of res judicata in the ideological level to further deepen the relevant research,let the theory ofresjudicata reflected in the legislation fully and correetly,strengthen the proceduralsafeguards to the parties,deepen judicial reform to strengthen the judicial authority,and greatly enhance the judges’ legaland professionalethics.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 既判力理論； 民事訴訟； 司法適用；
【Key words】 theory of res judicata； civilaction； judicial application；
 
20、代位權(quán)訴訟中債務(wù)人權(quán)益保護(hù)淺析
王超（秦皇島職業(yè)技術(shù)學(xué)院）;姜瑞云 （石家莊機(jī)械化步兵學(xué)院政治理論室）
 
【摘要】 代位權(quán)作為債的保全制度之一,其設(shè)立的目的在于督促債務(wù)人積極追索其擁有的債權(quán),以維護(hù)債權(quán)人的利益。我國(guó)的代位權(quán)制度在維護(hù)債權(quán)人利益的同時(shí),在立法上卻忽略了債務(wù)人的利益保護(hù)。必須從多個(gè)層面修改和完善代位權(quán)制度,以期達(dá)到在維護(hù)債權(quán)人利益的同時(shí),亦防止損害債務(wù)人利益。 
【Abstract】 Subrogation as one of the debt security system s is to urge the debtors set up their own positive claim s of recourse to safeguard the interests ofcreditors. Our subrogation system is also established for this purpose.However,it neglects in legislation to protectthe interests of the debtors.We should im prove the subrogation system to wellprotectthe interests of the creditors,and to protectthe interests ofthe debtors as well.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 債權(quán)人； 債務(wù)人； 代位權(quán)；
【Key words】 creditor； debtor； subrogation；
 
21、社會(huì)整合與人民法庭的功能定位
劉新星（西南政法大學(xué)行政法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 隨著鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型,鄉(xiāng)民與國(guó)家、家庭、傳統(tǒng)規(guī)范之間的紐帶早已松懈,個(gè)人對(duì)社會(huì)保有的團(tuán)結(jié)情感和道德責(zé)任感隨之淡薄,鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)的整合問(wèn)題將越來(lái)越突出。人民法庭的司法運(yùn)作在修復(fù)國(guó)家與鄉(xiāng)民之間的關(guān)系,加強(qiáng)社會(huì)整合方面的功能越來(lái)越重要。雖然不少研究對(duì)人民法庭能動(dòng)的、便民的司法運(yùn)行模式持否定態(tài)度,但若立足于整體分析的方法與視角,從人民法庭對(duì)鄉(xiāng)村社會(huì)整合的功能意義出發(fā)卻可以發(fā)現(xiàn),這其實(shí)是人民法庭的功能性必要條件。 
【Abstract】 In the process ofsocialtransform ation,the link which between the villagers and the state,or between the villagers and fam ilies,or between the villagers and the traditional norm s has slack. As the em otional and moral responsibility indifference,the integration problem of rural community will become more and more prom inent. In the repairing the relationship between the state and the villagers,and m aintaining the socialidentity and strengthening socialintegration, the role and function of people’s court are m ore and m ore im portant. Although many research don’t agree with the judicialway ofpeople’s court,based on the integral analysis method and the perspective,we found the active judicial way is the functional essentials of people’s court from itproceeding on rural social integration functions.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 社會(huì)整合； 人民法庭； 功能；
【Key words】 socialintegration； people’s court； function；
 
22、人大"審議意見(jiàn)"芻議
陳金玉 （河北省人大常委會(huì)）
 
【摘要】 聽(tīng)取和審議"一府兩院"專(zhuān)項(xiàng)工作報(bào)告、執(zhí)法檢查是各級(jí)人大常委會(huì)常用的主要監(jiān)督形式。隨著《監(jiān)督法》和《河北省實(shí)施﹤監(jiān)督法﹥辦法》的實(shí)施,聽(tīng)取報(bào)告、執(zhí)法檢查→提出審議意見(jiàn)→"一府兩院"研究處理→報(bào)告處理情況→向社會(huì)公布,逐漸形成了一個(gè)工作閉合路徑。審議意見(jiàn)越來(lái)越多的使用,已成為人大常委會(huì)綜合運(yùn)用監(jiān)督形式的有機(jī)組成部分,成為"一府兩院"做好整改工作的主要依據(jù)。重視理性思考,探析法定含義,正確運(yùn)用和規(guī)范"一府兩院"研究處理審議意見(jiàn),對(duì)于不斷提高監(jiān)督質(zhì)量,增強(qiáng)整改效果,顯得十分必要。 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 審議意見(jiàn)； 撰寫(xiě)交辦； 研究處理； 注意問(wèn)題；
 
23、追尋對(duì)沖基金監(jiān)管法制路徑——嬗變與評(píng)述
鳳建軍 （清華大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 對(duì)沖基金是美國(guó)"非銀行金融體系"的重要組成部分之一,其長(zhǎng)期存在于美國(guó)的金融市場(chǎng)中,并且呈現(xiàn)出不斷發(fā)展壯大的趨勢(shì),盡管美國(guó)相關(guān)金融法制一直在尋求金融監(jiān)管與金融創(chuàng)新之間的平衡,但在美國(guó)金融混業(yè)經(jīng)營(yíng)模式下,對(duì)對(duì)沖基金監(jiān)管的漏洞將可能引發(fā)"系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)",尤其是金融危機(jī)的出現(xiàn)更加堅(jiān)定了立法者和監(jiān)管者必須采取措施填補(bǔ)這一監(jiān)管漏洞。《多得-弗蘭克法案》對(duì)對(duì)沖基金等私募基金的監(jiān)管進(jìn)行了立法改革,采取了相應(yīng)的監(jiān)管措施。追尋美國(guó)關(guān)于對(duì)沖基金監(jiān)管法制改革歷程,其充分反映了金融立法中自由、安全、公平、效率等法律價(jià)值的動(dòng)態(tài)博弈。 
【Abstract】 Hedge fund is one of the mostim portantparts of the "non-bank financialsystem "in the U .S. With the development of hedge fund,the financial regulators wantto seek a balance between financialregulation and financialinnovation in financial regulation law. Because the U .S. chooses the model of financial mixed operation,the regulation gap of hedge fund will cause the "system atic risk". Now under the background offinancialcrisis,the legislator and regulator make up their minds to take measures to fill this gap. The related reforms of Dodd-Frank Acttighten the supervision over the hedge fund. Looking back the reform progress of hedge fund regulation,we will find this progress is a dynam ic game about the value of freedom ,security,justice and efficiency in the financiallaw.   
【關(guān)鍵詞】 對(duì)沖基金； 系統(tǒng)性風(fēng)險(xiǎn)； 金融監(jiān)管； 《多得-弗蘭克法案》；
【Key words】 hedge fund； system atic risk； financialregulation； Dodd-Frank Act；
 
24、貪污賄賂犯罪死刑制度爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題研究
李煒 （河北工業(yè)大學(xué)管理學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 死刑作為刑罰體系中最嚴(yán)厲的一種制度,對(duì)中國(guó)各個(gè)歷史時(shí)期的政治、經(jīng)濟(jì)和社會(huì)都產(chǎn)生了重要影響。貪污賄賂犯罪作為一種世界現(xiàn)象,在當(dāng)今中國(guó)引起高度關(guān)注和普遍聲討。對(duì)當(dāng)前形勢(shì)下貪污賄賂犯罪死刑制度的存廢、對(duì)貪污賄賂犯罪"死緩"的適用等爭(zhēng)議問(wèn)題進(jìn)行系統(tǒng)研究和理性思考。 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 貪污賄賂； 死刑制度； 爭(zhēng)議；
 
25、農(nóng)民工勞資糾紛司法救濟(jì)的困境與破解——檢察機(jī)關(guān)支持起訴的視角
曹?chē)?guó)華（浙江省桐鄉(xiāng)市人民檢察院）;陶伯進(jìn) （南京大學(xué)法學(xué)院）
 
【摘要】 農(nóng)民工是我國(guó)社會(huì)轉(zhuǎn)型過(guò)程中出現(xiàn)的特殊群體,由于其自身和社會(huì)的原因?qū)е缕淅�益更易受侵�?而非制度化的私力救濟(jì)往往構(gòu)成社會(huì)風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的重要來(lái)源。通過(guò)支持起訴制度將其權(quán)利救濟(jì)納入正當(dāng)化程序有利于消除風(fēng)險(xiǎn)的不確定性。檢察機(jī)關(guān)對(duì)農(nóng)民工支持起訴應(yīng)在充分尊重私權(quán)自治基礎(chǔ)上,遵循合法、謙抑和有限原則,檢察機(jī)關(guān)支持起訴的案件范圍為農(nóng)民工因?yàn)閯趧?dòng)關(guān)系而產(chǎn)生實(shí)際損害。在對(duì)農(nóng)民工支持起訴活動(dòng)中,檢察機(jī)關(guān)兼具訴訟程序參與者和法律監(jiān)督者的雙重地位,相應(yīng)地具有立案權(quán)、收集證據(jù)權(quán)、提出支持起訴意見(jiàn)權(quán)、出席法庭權(quán)、對(duì)審判活動(dòng)提出意見(jiàn)權(quán)和抗訴權(quán)等職權(quán)。 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 農(nóng)民工； 支持起訴； 社會(huì)權(quán)利； 檢察機(jī)關(guān)；
 
26、論檢察官充當(dāng)刑事和解調(diào)解人角色的理性思考
錢(qián)昌夫（浙江省紹興市越城區(qū)人民檢察院）;彭新華 （浙江省紹興市人民檢察院）
 
【摘要】 調(diào)解人角色的選擇直接影響刑事和解模式。我國(guó)法學(xué)理論界強(qiáng)調(diào)由社區(qū)等民間組織承擔(dān)刑事和解調(diào)解人,檢察實(shí)踐中卻出現(xiàn)檢察官直接調(diào)解、委托人民調(diào)解員調(diào)解和當(dāng)事人自行和解等多元化模式。通過(guò)對(duì)世界各國(guó)刑事和解調(diào)解人角色定位的比較分析,以及對(duì)當(dāng)前我國(guó)刑事和解的實(shí)證分析,檢察官直接充當(dāng)刑事和解調(diào)解人是一種理性選擇。 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 刑事和解； 調(diào)解人角色； 理性思考；
 
27、基層檢察室開(kāi)展社區(qū)矯正檢察工作初探——以浙江省湖州市長(zhǎng)興縣人民檢察院的探索實(shí)踐為例
朱為學(xué);顧浩 （浙江省湖州市長(zhǎng)興縣人民檢察院）
【摘要】 社區(qū)矯正作為新型的刑罰執(zhí)行方式和行為矯治模式,必須由鄉(xiāng)鎮(zhèn)街道等基層社區(qū)矯正組織以貼近被執(zhí)行人生產(chǎn)生活的方式開(kāi)展,這就必然要求相應(yīng)的檢察監(jiān)督工作也要隨之深入基層。從理論和實(shí)踐出發(fā),闡述基層檢察室的設(shè)立對(duì)推進(jìn)社區(qū)矯正檢察工作的意義。 
【關(guān)鍵詞】 基層檢察室； 社區(qū)矯正； 法律監(jiān)督；

日期：2012-7-26 14:34:14 | 關(guān)閉 |  分享到：